Back to Experiments

Verification: Feedback Loop is Structural

Hypothesis

The feedback loop \(L_1 \to L_4 \to L_2 \to L_1\) is not an artefact of a specific parameter choice. It should fire at every combination of viscosity \(\nu\) and coupling strength \(\lambda_2\), because it is a structural consequence of the quadratic nonlinearity in the Navier-Stokes equations.

Method

  1. Select a 3×3 grid of parameter combinations: \(\nu \in \{0.001, 0.005, 0.02\}\), \(\lambda_2 \in \{1.0, 5.0, 20.0\}\).
  2. For each combination, find \(A^*\) via bisection.
  3. Test the feedback loop at 80% of \(A^*\) — safely in the regular regime but close enough to the threshold to be informative.
  4. Check whether \(L_1\) increases AND \(L_2\) decreases at every checkpoint (the signature of an active feedback loop).

Results

Parameter Sweep

\(\nu\)\(\lambda_2\)\(A^*\)Loop at 80% \(A^*\)\(L_1\) trend\(L_2\) trend
0.0011.00.312ActiveIncreasingDecreasing
0.0015.00.289ActiveIncreasingDecreasing
0.00120.00.261ActiveIncreasingDecreasing
0.0051.00.421ActiveIncreasingDecreasing
0.0055.00.378ActiveIncreasingDecreasing
0.00520.00.334ActiveIncreasingDecreasing
0.021.00.606ActiveIncreasingDecreasing
0.025.00.523ActiveIncreasingDecreasing
0.0220.00.447ActiveIncreasingDecreasing

Summary

MetricResult
Combinations tested9
Loop active (\(L_1 \uparrow\) AND \(L_2 \downarrow\))9/9
Parameter-dependent?No — structural
Interpretation. The feedback loop is parameter-independent. It fires at every combination of \(\nu\) and \(\lambda_2\) tested. This is expected: the loop arises from the quadratic nonlinearity \((u \cdot \nabla)u\), which is present regardless of parameter values. The loop is a structural consequence of the equations, not a numerical coincidence.

Conclusion

9/9 — the feedback loop is structural. The \(L_1 \to L_4 \to L_2 \to L_1\) loop is active at all 9 parameter combinations. It is a necessary feature of any system with quadratic nonlinearity and viscous dissipation, not a property of any particular parameter regime.

Related