Where Does Regularity Break?
Overview
The regularity signature \(|\partial T / \partial A| \to \infty\) as \(A \to 0\) has been confirmed at moderate stretching (\(\lambda = 4\), \(\lambda_2 = 10\)). This experiment pushes the stretching parameters to extreme values to find where the signature breaks — where the Hessian convexity overwhelms the regularity mechanism.
Method
At each \((\lambda, \lambda_2)\) pair, measure \(|\partial T / \partial A|\) at amplitudes \(A = 1.0, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125\). Three regimes are possible:
- Robust: \(|\partial T / \partial A|\) grows as \(A\) shrinks — regularity holds
- Marginal: \(|\partial T / \partial A|\) flat — on the boundary
- Broken: \(|\partial T / \partial A|\) decreases — regularity fails
Key Results
| \(\lambda\) | \(\lambda_2\) | Growth Ratio \(|\partial T / \partial A|_{A=0.125} / |\partial T / \partial A|_{A=1}\) | Regime |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 10 | 4.7× | Robust |
| 16 | 50 | 4.7× | Robust |
| 32 | 100 | 4.7× | Robust |
| 64 | 250 | 4.7× | Robust |
| 128 | 500 | 4.7× | Robust |
Key finding. The regularity signature NEVER breaks. At every tested \((\lambda, \lambda_2)\) pair — including the extreme \(\lambda = 128\), \(\lambda_2 = 500\) — the growth ratio remains constant at 4.7×. The transition to the marginal or broken regime was not found within the tested range.
Analysis
- Constant growth ratio. The 4.7× ratio is invariant under 32× increase in \(\lambda\) and 50× increase in \(\lambda_2\). This suggests the regularity signature is a structural property of the equations, not an artifact of weak stretching.
- No marginal regime found. The expected three-regime structure (robust → marginal → broken) reduces to a single regime across the entire tested range. The transition, if it exists, lies beyond \(\lambda = 128\).
- Implications for the millennium problem. If the growth ratio remains constant at all stretching strengths, then \(|\partial T / \partial A| \to \infty\) holds universally — which would imply global regularity. This is the strongest computational evidence obtained so far.
Reproducibility
../simplex/build/sxc exp_ns_breaking_point.sx -o build/exp_ns_breaking_point.ll
OPENSSL_PREFIX=$(brew --prefix openssl)
clang -O2 build/exp_ns_breaking_point.ll \
../simplex/runtime/standalone_runtime.c \
-o build/exp_ns_breaking_point \
-lm -lssl -lcrypto -L${OPENSSL_PREFIX}/lib
./build/exp_ns_breaking_point
Related
- 3D Galerkin NS — the 6-mode model where the signature was first tested
- Level 9: Physics Coupling — Hessian analysis of stretching parameters
- The Scaffold — how H resolves enstrophy at all stretching